The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the NEET PG 2024 case on Friday after being adjourned for the fifth time. The case has raised pertinent questions about the transparency of the examination process and the functioning of the NBEMS. Despite this, the NBEMS still hasn't addressed the concerns, and aspirants are keenly waiting for clarity on the results of the NEET PG 2024.
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the NEET PG 2024 case today after the hearing was deferred five times. Last week's hearing, which was scheduled for November 26, was adjourned for a week following the petitioners' request. Justices BR Gavai and MV Viswanathan will now hear the case that has raised serious doubts over the transparency and fairness of the examination process.
Apart from the legal challenges and the ongoing MCC NEET PG counselling 2024, several states, including Madhya Pradesh, Telangana, and Rajasthan, are also dealing with petitions filed against alleged discrepancies in the NEET PG results. Candidates have expressed dissatisfaction over the non-disclosure of the answer key and exam content by the National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS), citing exam policy as the reason for the refusal.
NEET PG 2024: Irregularities
Several irregularities in the conduct of NEET PG 2024 have been pointed out by aspirants, making more than 2 lakh candidates frustrated. The problems are as follows:
- Multiple Postponements: The date for the exam was postponed many times, which created unrest and stress among the aspirants.
- Transparency: The NBEMS hasn't produced an answer key, raw scores and details of the normalization process citing the examination policies as most candidates feel these are non-accountable.
- Discrepitant Outcomes: NEET PG 2024 results contain errors and anomalies, and mass petitions have been filed in various states.
- Unclear Normalization Process: "The normalization process was very discriminatory. It was based on score. This is the process of ranking.
NEET PG aspirants have already voiced their issues. They require more transparency from NBEMS and clarification over issues threatening their chances. Now, SC will take up the matter, and the aspirants hope a solution for this will come across to provide a fair environment.
